<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Llm on Brett Smith</title>
    <link>/tags/llm/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Llm on Brett Smith</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.148.1</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 13:28:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/llm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Maybe Non-Deterministic Behavior is What We Want When Writing Code</title>
      <link>/archive/2026/01/04/maybe-non-deterministic-behavior-is-what-we-want-when-writing-code/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 13:28:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>/archive/2026/01/04/maybe-non-deterministic-behavior-is-what-we-want-when-writing-code/</guid>
      <description>&lt;img src=&#34;/archive/2026/01/04/maybe-non-deterministic-behavior-is-what-we-want-when-writing-code/tweet.png&#34; alt=&#34;Mike Hostetler tweet about LLM non-determinism&#34;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had always seen the non-deterministic behavior of LLM&amp;rsquo;s as the shortcoming with code generation, but this comment really had me realizing that doing things incorrectly and unconventionally is how you experiment and come up with new ways to build things&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Non-deterministic behavior is not only the path for innovation, but it is also how nature works. Maybe the machines will use this natural non-deterministic nature of building to create software we couldn&amp;rsquo;t imagine in our tightly controlled box of deterministic code writing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
