<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Productivity on Brett Smith</title>
    <link>/tags/productivity/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Productivity on Brett Smith</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.148.1</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/productivity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Chasing that Flow State</title>
      <link>/archive/2025/07/22/chasing-that-flow-state/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/archive/2025/07/22/chasing-that-flow-state/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Geoffrey Huntley&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href=&#34;https://x.com/GeoffreyHuntley/status/1947389931510501805&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener noreferrer&#34;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;
 on X about how addictive coding with AI is 100% true. &lt;strong&gt;The flow state is highly addictive&lt;/strong&gt;. Before using LLM&amp;rsquo;s, when I would be working on a bug, I didn&amp;rsquo;t want any distractions. I would wait until I knew I had a block of time to solve it, which inevitably led to procrastination because I couldn&amp;rsquo;t find the &amp;ldquo;perfect time&amp;rdquo;. It would take so much effort to enter that flow state, but once I did, it felt incredible. I think that&amp;rsquo;s what we are all chasing when we fall in love with coding. The flow state.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
